Banking resilience, tested in detailAtlant Security
Bank/PentestBY ATLANT SECURITY

BANK PENETRATION TESTING

Payment workflow & authorisation testing

Verify who can draft, change, approve and release a payment.

Discuss your requirements

The boundary worth testing

A maker-checker control can appear correct in the user interface while a service principal can call both operations. Token audience, operation scope and transaction version need to remain bound to the business policy.

A support application can become an entry point to CI credentials and an overprivileged payment identity. A separate signing service may still prevent release. A useful assessment explains each transition instead of turning one vulnerable host into a claim that the entire bank was compromised.

What the scope can include

  • Beneficiary and transaction field authorisation
  • Maker-checker separation across human and service roles
  • Approval invalidation after a material draft change
  • Independent signing, release and audit attribution

The final proposal identifies the specific applications, accounts, environments and interfaces included. It also states which prerequisites your team or a supplier must provide.

What useful proof looks like

Use one canary payment with settlement disabled. Capture the draft version before and after each operation, confirm the actor in the audit record and test the release boundary independently.

Preserve UTC time, asset identifier, requesting principal, expected decision and observed response. State-changing tests need confirmation from the resulting object or a trusted audit record. Denied operations and effective controls remain part of the outcome.

Safety and assessment limits

A successful draft or approval write is an integrity finding, not evidence of completed fraud. Reconciliation and rollback responsibilities belong in the rules of engagement.

Use seeded payments and synthetic customers with settlement disabled. Agree independent stop authority, transaction reconciliation, named system owners and permission for third-party services. Separate demonstrated draft changes from unperformed fund transfers.

Close the loop

Connect each weakness to a named owner, immediate safeguard and durable correction. Define positive and negative retest cases so the change restores the intended boundary while preserving legitimate use. Open items retain their dependencies and deadlines.

Preview the sector sample report to see the evidence and treatment-plan format.

LET’S START A CONVERSATION

Define the scope.
Take the next step.

Your systems, operating constraints and security objectives. A clear starting point for the test.

Discuss your pentest